<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Terminus Est</title>
	<link>http://terminusest.info</link>
	<description>The world according to Eben Flood</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 17:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Our health care rocks</title>
		<link>http://terminusest.info/archives/125</link>
		<comments>http://terminusest.info/archives/125#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 17:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mr_flood</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Current Events]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terminusest.info/archives/125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A nice article comparing our health care system to those of other countries with socialized medicine.
According to an August 2008 study published in Lancet Oncology, the renowned British medical journal, Americans have a better than five-year survival rate for 13 of the 16 most prominent cancers when compared with their European and Canadian counterparts.
With breast [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A <a href="http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives2/2008/08/021315.php">nice article</a> comparing our health care system to those of other countries with socialized medicine.</p>
<blockquote><p>According to an August 2008 study published in Lancet Oncology, the renowned British medical journal, Americans have a better than five-year survival rate for 13 of the 16 most prominent cancers when compared with their European and Canadian counterparts.</p>
<p>With breast cancer, for instance, the survival rate among American women is 83.9 percent. For women in Britain, it’s just 69.7 percent. For men with prostate cancer, the survival rate is 91.9 percent here but just 73.7 percent in France and 51.1 percent in Britain. </p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://terminusest.info/archives/125/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Excellent AGW article from former proponent</title>
		<link>http://terminusest.info/archives/124</link>
		<comments>http://terminusest.info/archives/124#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 17:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mr_flood</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terminusest.info/archives/124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the Austrailian:

But since 1999 new evidence has seriously weakened the case that carbon emissions are the main cause of global warming, and by 2007 the evidence was pretty conclusive that carbon played only a minor role and was not the main cause of the recent global warming. As Lord Keynes famously said, &#8220;When the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the <a href="http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,24036736-7583,00.html">Austrailian:<br />
</a></p>
<blockquote><p>But since 1999 new evidence has seriously weakened the case that carbon emissions are the main cause of global warming, and by 2007 the evidence was pretty conclusive that carbon played only a minor role and was not the main cause of the recent global warming. As Lord Keynes famously said, &#8220;When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do, sir?&#8221;</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://terminusest.info/archives/124/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fears of an Ice Age</title>
		<link>http://terminusest.info/archives/123</link>
		<comments>http://terminusest.info/archives/123#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 20:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mr_flood</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terminusest.info/archives/123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The typical conservative reaction to this article is &#8220;why wont this get as much coverage as the AGW articles?&#8221; Of course, we already know the answer: there&#8217;s no money in it.  What should our reactions be to this type of news?  I&#8217;m not sure, perhaps the only real action that we can take [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The typical conservative reaction to <a href="http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,23583376-5013480,00.html">this article</a> is &#8220;why wont this get as much coverage as the AGW articles?&#8221; Of course, we already know the answer: there&#8217;s no money in it.  What should our reactions be to this type of news?  I&#8217;m not sure, perhaps the only real action that we can take at this time is to play what little part we can in spreading the word.  From The Australian:</p>
<blockquote><p>All four agencies that track Earth&#8217;s temperature (the Hadley Climate Research Unit in Britain, the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies in New York, the Christy group at the University of Alabama, and Remote Sensing Systems Inc in California) report that it cooled by about 0.7C in 2007. This is the fastest temperature change in the instrumental record and it puts us back where we were in 1930. If the temperature does not soon recover, we will have to conclude that global warming is over.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://terminusest.info/archives/123/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Temperature from 1998 to 2008</title>
		<link>http://terminusest.info/archives/122</link>
		<comments>http://terminusest.info/archives/122#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 18:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mr_flood</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terminusest.info/archives/122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some graphs showing the temperature fluctuations over the last ten years.  You&#8217;ll notice the last one is way out of step with the others and the author brings up a good reason why.  If you&#8217;d like further evidence as to why that last data set is suspect cruise on over to Climate Audit [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/2008/03/08/3-of-4-global-metrics-show-nearly-flat-temperature-anomaly-in-the-last-decade/#more-828">Some graphs</a> showing the temperature fluctuations over the last ten years.  You&#8217;ll notice the last one is way out of step with the others and the author brings up a good reason why.  If you&#8217;d like further evidence as to why that last data set is suspect cruise on over to <a href="http://www.climateaudit.org/">Climate Audit</a> where you&#8217;ll find lively discussions on that very subject.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://terminusest.info/archives/122/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Revising the 200 year old climate equations</title>
		<link>http://terminusest.info/archives/121</link>
		<comments>http://terminusest.info/archives/121#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 02:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mr_flood</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terminusest.info/archives/121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Daily tech highlights a Hungarian scientist that used to work for NASA and his paper that illustrates the original warming equations were done incorrectly because they set the atmosphere as being infinitely thick.  He reworked them with a more realistic value and found
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daily tech highlights a Hungarian scientist that used to work for NASA and his paper that illustrates the original warming equations were done incorrectly because they set the atmosphere as being infinitely thick.  He reworked them with a more realistic value and found</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://terminusest.info/archives/121/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another dose of climate reality</title>
		<link>http://terminusest.info/archives/120</link>
		<comments>http://terminusest.info/archives/120#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 14:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mr_flood</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terminusest.info/archives/120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the National Post of Canada
Snow cover over North America and much of Siberia, Mongolia and China is greater than at any time since 1966.
The U.S. National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) reported that many American cities and towns suffered record cold temperatures in January and early February. According to the NCDC, the average temperature in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the <a href="http://www.nationalpost.com/opinion/columnists/story.html?id=332289">National Post</a> of Canada</p>
<blockquote><p>Snow cover over North America and much of Siberia, Mongolia and China is greater than at any time since 1966.</p>
<p>The U.S. National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) reported that many American cities and towns suffered record cold temperatures in January and early February. According to the NCDC, the average temperature in January &#8220;was -0.3 F cooler than the 1901-2000 (20th century) average.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>You should read the rest, little bit of snark in it but not too much and a couple great talking points for your AGW friends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://terminusest.info/archives/120/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Truth be damned, of course</title>
		<link>http://terminusest.info/archives/119</link>
		<comments>http://terminusest.info/archives/119#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 14:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mr_flood</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Fascism Watch]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terminusest.info/archives/119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An insightful article from the Wall Street Journal highlighting the maniacal partisanship of Henry Waxman.  This doesn&#8217;t surprise me at all and makes me wonder if I should create a new category for topics entitled &#8216;Ho Hum&#8217;.
Mr. Waxman doesn&#8217;t much care if any of this is true, because his larger goal is to send [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120251629030955387.html?mod=opinion_main_review_and_outlooks">insightful article from the Wall Street Journal</a> highlighting the maniacal partisanship of Henry Waxman.  This doesn&#8217;t surprise me at all and makes me wonder if I should create a new category for topics entitled &#8216;Ho Hum&#8217;.</p>
<blockquote><p>Mr. Waxman doesn&#8217;t much care if any of this is true, because his larger goal is to send a message to every Inspector General in government: They answer to him. Mr. Waxman expects them to tee up political scandals in the executive branch and serve as witnesses for his prosecution whether or not the facts support it.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://terminusest.info/archives/119/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More jobs Americans wont do, except&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://terminusest.info/archives/118</link>
		<comments>http://terminusest.info/archives/118#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 14:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mr_flood</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Current Events]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terminusest.info/archives/118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Once again we learn that these jobs that we are told Americans wont do, they actually will do, once the illegals leave and the companies are forced to raise their wages.  From Google News
The effects of the law have been immediate, according to businessmen, workers and rights activists who spoke to AFP, with companies [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once again we learn that these jobs that we are told Americans wont do, they actually will do, once the illegals leave and the companies are forced to raise their wages.  From <a href="http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5iQouzi-WQPmPseZXHy1HuYogzGzw">Google News</a></p>
<blockquote><p>The effects of the law have been immediate, according to businessmen, workers and rights activists who spoke to AFP, with companies driving up wages to attract labor while being forced to part company with prized employees.</p></blockquote>
<p>It&#8217;s almost funny watching all the lefties do the dirty work for big business when they campaign against immigration enforcement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://terminusest.info/archives/118/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Global Cooling</title>
		<link>http://terminusest.info/archives/117</link>
		<comments>http://terminusest.info/archives/117#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 18:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mr_flood</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terminusest.info/archives/117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, low and behold
Since the mid-19th century, the mean global temperature has increased by 0.7 degrees Celsius. This slight warming is not unusual, and lies well within the range of natural variation. Carbon dioxide continues to build in the atmosphere, but the mean planetary temperature hasn&#8217;t increased significantly for nearly nine years. Antarctica is getting [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071219/COMMENTARY/10575140">low and behold</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Since the mid-19th century, the mean global temperature has increased by 0.7 degrees Celsius. This slight warming is not unusual, and lies well within the range of natural variation. Carbon dioxide continues to build in the atmosphere, but the mean planetary temperature hasn&#8217;t increased significantly for nearly nine years. Antarctica is getting colder.</p></blockquote>
<p>It&#8217;s from the Washington Times and is worth a read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://terminusest.info/archives/117/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AGW consensus? Not so much.</title>
		<link>http://terminusest.info/archives/116</link>
		<comments>http://terminusest.info/archives/116#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 15:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mr_flood</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terminusest.info/archives/116</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, Senator Inhofe has gone and done it.  Compiled a list of 400 scientists with published views skeptical of AGW.
The distinguished scientists featured in this new report are experts in diverse fields, including: climatology; oceanography; geology; biology; glaciology; biogeography; meteorology; oceanography; economics; chemistry; mathematics; environmental sciences; engineering; physics and paleoclimatology. Some of those profiled [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Senator Inhofe has gone and done it.  <a href="http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.Blogs&#038;ContentRecord_id=f80a6386-802a-23ad-40c8-3c63dc2d02cb">Compiled a list</a> of 400 scientists with published views skeptical of AGW.</p>
<blockquote><p>The distinguished scientists featured in this new report are experts in diverse fields, including: climatology; oceanography; geology; biology; glaciology; biogeography; meteorology; oceanography; economics; chemistry; mathematics; environmental sciences; engineering; physics and paleoclimatology. Some of those profiled have won Nobel Prizes for their outstanding contribution to their field of expertise and many shared a portion of the UN IPCC Nobel Peace Prize with Vice President Gore.</p></blockquote>
<p>Heh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://terminusest.info/archives/116/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
